Independent Allegra Spender Blasts Coalition’s ‘Net Zero’ Dump, Armed with Climate 200 Evidence
News article summarizing Newsletterusing Gemini AI/Fact checking A.Ritenis
Sydney, NSW – 14 November,2025
Independent Member for Wentworth, Allegra Spender, a leading figure among the so-called “Teal Independents” and a candidate backed by Climate 200, has fiercely criticised the Federal Coalition’s formal decision to abandon its commitment to net zero emissions by 2050.
In a decisive newsletter to her constituents—a move reflecting the strong climate action mandate of the Teal movement—Ms Spender branded the reversal as “disappointing,” warning it creates “uncertainty for businesses and investors” and lacks any clear plan for lowering both energy bills and emissions. She asserted that the Coalition’s policy fundamentally fails to address the twin goals of “urgent climate action” and affordability that underpinned her election”We know that urgent climate action is needed, and that power bills need to come down. This is not the right policy to achieve either goal,” Ms Spender wrote.
The Economic Case for Renewables: Lower Bills
Ms Spender’s primary attack was on the Coalition’s justification that scrapping net zero is necessary to ensure energy affordability. She used hard evidence to counter this claim, a key feature of the Teal independents’ appeal to fiscally responsible voters.
“We all want lower power bills,” Ms Spender noted. “But experts like the International Energy Agency are clear that following a pathway to net zero emissions by 2050 is the best way to bring household energy bills down.”
She backed this with specific, compelling data:
-
The CSIRO’s latest GenCost report found the total firmed cost of renewables (including storage and transmission) will be the lowest of all new-build technologies by 2030.
-
A recent study from Griffith University found that if Australia had relied solely on coal and gas instead of pursuing renewables, wholesale power prices would be 30-50% higher today.
-
In 2024, a full 40% of Australia’s electricity generation came from renewable sources, demonstrating significant progress that she argues must be built upon.
“We need to stick with certainty and build on the progress we’ve made,” she stressed, directly refuting the idea that renewables are the cause of cost pressures.
Conflict with Paris Agreement and Investor Confidence
Ms Spender, whose platform aligns with the integrity goals of the Teal movement, also highlighted the contradiction between the Coalition’s desire to remain in the Paris Agreement while dumping Australia’s legislated net zero targets. She argued that removing these targets is contradictory to the Agreement’s core requirement for “progression over time.”
Furthermore, she warned of the threat to economic stability. She cited major business groups, including the Business Council of Australia, who view the 2050 net zero goal as an investment opportunity that demands stable policy settings.”Businesses won’t build multi-decade energy systems, if the next election might change the rules – uncertainty drives investment away,” she warned, underscoring the lack of policy certainty that the Climate 200-backed movement campaigned against.
Ms Spender concluded by affirming her commitment to the fight, reflecting the resolve of the Teal cohort to hold the government accountable on climate policy: “I’m not giving up – because the evidence is clear, and it points us in the right direction.”
